Skip to main content

Explicit Anomalous Cognition: A Review of the Best Evidence in Ganzfeld, Forced-choice, Remote Viewing and Dream Studies

📄 Original study
Baptista, Johann, Derakhshani, Max, Tressoldi, Patrizio 2015 Modern Era overview

📌 Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This is the ultimate lab-based ESP report card, pulling together evidence from four ways scientists test psychic perception: ganzfeld (a sensory-deprivation setup), forced-choice guessing, remote viewing (describing a hidden distant target), and dream telepathy. The headline? People who seem to have a knack for this absolutely crush it — ganzfeld hit rates jump from 27% to over 40%, and experienced remote viewers need remarkably few trials to show a real effect. The review also prescribes best practices for future work: pre-register studies, run proper power analyses, and use modern meta-analytic methods. Both a scoreboard and a how-to guide for next-generation ESP research.

Related Papers

Cites

Also by these authors

More in Overview

📋 Cite this paper
APA
Baptista, Johann, Derakhshani, Max, Tressoldi, Patrizio (2015). Explicit Anomalous Cognition: A Review of the Best Evidence in Ganzfeld, Forced-choice, Remote Viewing and Dream Studies. Parapsychology: A Handbook for the 21st Century (E. Cardeña, J. Palmer, & D. Marcusson-Clavertz, Eds.), McFarland.
BibTeX
@article{baptista_2015_explicit_anomalous_cognition,
  title = {Explicit Anomalous Cognition: A Review of the Best Evidence in Ganzfeld, Forced-choice, Remote Viewing and Dream Studies},
  author = {Baptista, Johann and Derakhshani, Max and Tressoldi, Patrizio},
  year = {2015},
  journal = {Parapsychology: A Handbook for the 21st Century (E. Cardeña, J. Palmer, & D. Marcusson-Clavertz, Eds.), McFarland},
}