Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research
π Original studyπ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
For 25 years, the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) lab asked volunteers to psychically describe faraway locations being visited by a partner. After 653 trials with 72 people, the results were striking: a statistical score so strong (p = 3 in 100 million) that chance alone basically can't explain it. Even wilder, it didn't matter how far away the target was or whether the attempt happened before or after the visit. But here's the twist β as the researchers sharpened their scoring tools to pin down exactly what was happening, the effect got smaller. They call this 'uncertainty complementarity,' suggesting that the harder you try to measure this phenomenon precisely, the more it slips through your fingers. It's a fascinating paradox that may help explain why psi effects so often shrink under tighter lab controls.
Actual Paper Abstract
This article has four purposes: 1) to present for the first time in archival form all results of some 25 years of remote perception research at this laboratory; 2) to describe all of the analytical scoring methods developed over the course of this program to quantify the amount of anomalous information acquired in the experiments; 3) to display a remarkable anti-correlation between the objective specificity of those methods and the anomalous yield of the experiments; and 4) to discuss the phenomenological and pragmatic implications of this complementarity. The formal database comprises 653 experimental trials performed over several phases of investigation. The scoring methods involve various arrays of descriptor queries that can be addressed to both the physical targets and the percipients'description thereof, the responses to which provide the basis for numerical evaluation and statistical assessment of the degree of anomalous information acquired. Twenty-four such recipes have been employed, with queries posed in binary, ternary, quaternary, and ten-level distributive formats. Thus treated, the database yields a composite z-score against chance of 5.418 ( p 5 3 3 102 8, one-tailed). Numerous subsidiary analyses agree that these overall results are not significantly affected by any of the secondary protocol parameters tested, or by variations in descriptor effectiveness, possible participant response biases, target distance from the percipient, or time interval between perception effort and agent target visitation. However, over the course of the program there has been a striking diminution of the anomalous yield that appears to be associated with the participants'growing attention to, and dependence upon, the progressively more detailed descriptor formats and with the corresponding reduction in the content of the accompanying free-response transcripts. The possibility that increased emphasis on objective quantification of the phenomenon somehow may have inhibited its inherently subjective expression is explored in several contexts, ranging from contemporary signal processing technologies to ancient divination traditions. An intrinsic complementarity is suggested between the analytical and intuitive aspects of the remote perception process that, like its more familiar counterpart in quantum science, brings with it an inescapable uncertainty that limits the extent to which such anomalous effects can be simultaneously produced and evaluated.
Research Notes
The definitive archival publication of the PEAR remote perception program β one of the largest single-laboratory databases in parapsychology. Its 'uncertainty complementarity' thesis directly addresses why psi effects appear to decline under tighter experimental controls, a central question in the replication debate.
Presents the complete results of 25 years of remote perception research at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory, comprising 653 formal trials by 72 volunteer participants. Percipients attempted to describe unknown geographical targets visited by agents, with 24 analytical scoring methods applied across binary, quaternary, and distributive descriptor formats. The composite database yielded z = 5.418 (p = 3Γ10β»βΈ), confirming anomalous information acquisition with no attenuation by distance or time. However, progressive refinement of scoring methods correlated with declining effect sizes, suggesting a complementarity between analytical precision and the subjective process generating the anomaly.
Related Papers
Cites
- Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding β Targ, Russell (1974)
- A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent Research β Puthoff, Harold E (1976)
- Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention: A Review of a 12-Year Program β Jahn, Robert G (1997)
- Advances in Remote-Viewing Analysis β May, Edwin C (1990)
Same Research Program
- The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective β Jahn, Robert G (1982)
- Engineering Anomalies Research β Jahn, Robert G (1987)
- Mind/Machine Interaction Consortium: PortREG Replication Experiments β Jahn, Robert G (2000)
- The PEAR Proposition β Jahn, Robert G (2005)
- Precognitive Remote Viewing in the Chicago Area: A Replication of the Stanford Experiment β Dunne, Brenda J (1979)
- On the Quantum Mechanics of Consciousness, with Application to Anomalous Phenomena β Jahn, Robert G (1986)
Companion
Cited By
- The MegaREG Experiment: Replication and Interpretation β Dobyns, Y. H (2004)
- Remote Viewing as Applied to Futures Studies β Lee, James H (2008)
- The Experimental Evidence for Parapsychological Phenomena: A Review β CardeΓ±a, Etzel (2018)
- Explicit Anomalous Cognition: A Review of the Best Evidence in Ganzfeld, Forced-choice, Remote Viewing and Dream Studies β Baptista, Johann (2015)
- Anomalous Cognition: An Umbrella Review of the Meta-Analytic Evidence β Tressoldi, Patrizio (2021)
Also by these authors
More in Remote Viewing
Exploring the Correlates and Nature of Subjective Anomalous Interactions with Objects (Psychometry): A Mixed Methods Survey
Follow-up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) Remote Viewing Experiments
The Location and Reconstruction of a Byzantine Structure in Marea, Egypt, Including a Comparison of Electronic Remote Sensing and Remote Viewing
Greg Kolodziejzyk's 13-Year Associative Remote Viewing Experiment Results
Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence: The Case of Non-Local Perception, a Classical and Bayesian Review of Evidences
π Cite this paper
Dunne, Brenda J, Jahn, Robert G (2003). Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
@article{dunne_jahn_2003_pear,
title = {Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research},
author = {Dunne, Brenda J and Jahn, Robert G},
year = {2003},
journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}