Skip to main content

Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention: A Review of a 12-Year Program

📄 Original study
Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Nelson, Roger D 1997 Modern Era psychokinesis

📌 Appears in:

Plain English Summary

After twelve years and nearly two and a half million trials, Princeton's PEAR lab dropped its definitive report card. Ninety-one volunteers sat before electronic coin-flip generators and simply intended the output to go high or low. The combined result was so far beyond chance that fluke odds were in the trillions-to-one range, though the effect was tiny — roughly one shifted bit per ten thousand. The clever twist: pseudorandom sources (generators following a predetermined hidden sequence) showed zero effect, ruling out equipment glitches. Distance didn't matter either. This remains the largest controlled mind-matter dataset ever assembled.

Actual Paper Abstract

Strong correlations between output distribution means of a variety of random binary processes and pre-stated intentions of some 100 individual human operators have been established over a 12-year experimental program. More than 1000 experimental series, employing four different categories of random devices and several distinctive protocols, show comparable magnitudes of anomalous mean shifts from chance expectation, with similar distribution structures. Although the absolute effect sizes are quite small, of the order of bits deviation per bit processed, over the huge databases accumulated, the composite effect exceeds 70 (p = 3.5 x 10-13). These data display significant disparities between female and male operator performances, and consistent serial position effects in individual and collective results. Data generated by operators far removed from the machines and exerting their efforts at times other than those of machine operation show similar effect sizes and structural details to those of the local, on-time experiments. Most other secondary parameters tested are found to have little effect on the scale and character of the results, with one important exception: studies performed using fully deterministic pseudorandom sources, either hard-wired or algorithmic, yield null overall mean shifts, and display no other anomalous features.

Research Notes

The largest and most comprehensive mind-matter interaction dataset. Published in Journal of Scientific Exploration. Establishes critical random vs pseudorandom source distinction that constrains theoretical models. Essential for Controversy #8 (GCP/collective consciousness).

Definitive summary of the 12-year Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) program studying correlations between random binary process outputs and pre-stated human intentions. 91 anonymous operators generated 2,497,200 trials in 522 tripolar (HI/LO/BL) series using electronic random event generators. Composite data-weighted z-score = 7.180 (p = 3.50 × 10⁻¹³); benchmark REG alone: z = 3.81 (p = 7 × 10⁻⁵). Effect size ~10⁻⁴ bits/bit. Critical finding: deterministic pseudorandom sources yielded null results (z = -0.671), supporting anomalous rather than artifact explanation. Gender differences: 66% males vs 34% females succeeded in HI-LO separation. Remote and off-time experiments showed similar effects to local/on-time.

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

📋 Cite this paper
APA
Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Nelson, Roger D (1997). Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention: A Review of a 12-Year Program. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
BibTeX
@article{jahn_1997_correlations,
  title = {Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention: A Review of a 12-Year Program},
  author = {Jahn, Robert G and Dunne, Brenda J and Nelson, Roger D},
  year = {1997},
  journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}