Decision Augmentation Theory: Toward a Model of Anomalous Mental Phenomena
⚡ Contested ↗📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
Here is a genuinely radical idea: what if psychokinesis — the supposed ability to move or influence objects with your mind — does not actually exist? Decision Augmentation Theory proposes that when people seem to mentally nudge random number generators (RNGs), what is really happening is precognition (glimpsing the future) steering their choices toward moments when the machine would have produced favorable results anyway. No mental force needed — just remarkably well-timed decisions. The exciting part is this is not just philosophy; the authors derived a concrete, testable prediction. Under their theory, the statistical evidence should stay constant regardless of how many random bits per trial you use, while a genuine force model predicts it should grow. They calculated you would need roughly 1,368 experimental runs to tell the two apart. If correct, every anomalous mental phenomenon collapses into one elegant mechanism: information flowing backward in time.
Abstract
Decision augmentation theory (DAT) holds that humans integrate information obtained by anomalous cognition into the usual decision process. The result is that, to a statistical degree, such decisions are biased toward volitional outcomes. We introduce our model and show that the domain over which it is applicable is within a few standard deviations from chance. We contrast the theory's experimental consequences with those of models that treat anomalous effects as due to a force. We derive mathematical expressions for DAT and force-like models using two distributions, normal and binomial. DAT is testable both retrospectively and prospectively, and we provide statistical power curves to assist in the experimental design of such tests. We show that the experimental consequences of our theory are different from those of force-like models except for one special case.
Related Papers
Cites
- Does Psi Exist? Replicable Evidence for an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer — Bem, Daryl J (1994)
- Replication and Meta-Analysis in Parapsychology — Utts, Jessica (1991)
- The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective — Jahn, Robert G (1982)
- A Joint Communiqué: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy — Hyman, Ray (1986)
- Evidence for Consciousness-Related Anomalies in Random Physical Systems — Radin, Dean I (1989)
Extended By
Cited By
- Follow-up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) Remote Viewing Experiments — Escolà-Gascón, Álex (2023)
- Assessing the Evidence for Mind-Matter Interaction Effects — Radin, Dean (2006)
- Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus — Rabeyron, Thomas (2020)
- Methods for Investigating Goal-Oriented Psi — Kennedy, J.E (1995)
- The Experimental Evidence for Parapsychological Phenomena: A Review — Cardeña, Etzel (2018)
- Apparent Association Between Effect Size in Free Response Anomalous Cognition Experiments and Local Sidereal Time — Spottiswoode, S. James P (1997)
Same Research Program
- Advances in Remote-Viewing Analysis — May, Edwin C (1990)
- A Double-Slit Diffraction Experiment to Investigate Claims of Consciousness-Related Anomalies — Ibison, Michael (1998)
- Apparent Association Between Effect Size in Free Response Anomalous Cognition Experiments and Local Sidereal Time — Spottiswoode, S. James P (1997)
- An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning — Utts, Jessica (1996)
Also by these authors
More in Methodology
Paranormal belief, conspiracy endorsement, and positive wellbeing: a network analysis
Planning Falsifiable Confirmatory Research
Addressing Researcher Fraud: Retrospective, Real-Time, and Preventive Strategies — Including Legal Points and Data Management That Prevents Fraud
Quantum Aspects of the Brain-Mind Relationship: A Hypothesis with Supporting Evidence
Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research
📋 Cite this paper
May, Edwin C, Utts, Jessica M, Spottiswoode, S. James P (1995). Decision Augmentation Theory: Toward a Model of Anomalous Mental Phenomena. The Journal of Parapsychology.
@article{may_1995_decision,
title = {Decision Augmentation Theory: Toward a Model of Anomalous Mental Phenomena},
author = {May, Edwin C and Utts, Jessica M and Spottiswoode, S. James P},
year = {1995},
journal = {The Journal of Parapsychology},
}