Skip to main content

Engineering Anomalies Research

Contested
Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Nelson, Roger D 1987 STAR GATE Era psychokinesis

📌 Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This is the paper that launched a thousand debates. In 1987, Princeton's PEAR lab asked whether human minds can nudge random electronic devices — psychokinesis, or "mind over matter." They tested three machines: a high-speed electronic coin-flipper, a pseudo-random source (looks random but follows a hidden pattern), and a mechanical cascade (picture a giant Plinko board). Across all three, people who intended the output to shift produced small but real effects, with odds against chance from 5,000-to-1 up to 300,000-to-1. Individual operators even showed consistent personal "signatures" that carried across devices. This foundational study became the bedrock that virtually every later mind-matter experiment built upon or tried to tear apart.

Actual Paper Abstract

Anomalous consciousness-related phenomena of possible relevance to basic physical science and modern engineering practice are addressed experimentally and theoretically in an effort to identify those devices, systems, and processes most likely to display operator-related anomalies in their performance, and to illuminate the characteristics of such aberrations. Three interrelated sectors of effort are pursued: the design, implementation, operation, and interpretation of experiments in low-level psychokinesis; the development of analytical methodologies for quantitative assessment of precognitive remote perception data: and the development of theoretical models useful for correlation of the experimental data, design of better experiments, and explication of the phenomena on fundamental grounds.

The primary effect observed in the psychokinesis experiments is a marginal but replicable shift of the mean of output count distributions with respect to empirical baselines or theoretical expectations, with no discernible alterations in any higher moments. Over large data bases, these mean shifts can compound with considerable statistical regularity to high levels of significance, depending on the particular operator, the direction of effort, and other prevailing experimental conditions. In many cases, individual operator "signatures" of achievement are found to transfer across various experimental devices, including some driven by deterministic pseudo-random sources.

Quantitative analysis of a large data base of remote perception experiments reveals similar departures from chance expectation of the degree of target information acquired by anomalous means. Digital scoring techniques based on a spectrum of 30 binary descriptors, applied to all targets and perceptions in the experimental pool, consistently indicate acquisition of substantial topical and impressionistic information about remote geographical locations inaccessible by known sensory channels. The degree of such anomalous information acquisition appears independent of the spatial separation of the percipient from the target, up to global distances, and also independent of the temporal separation of the perception effort from the time of target specification by the agent, up to periods of precognition or retrocognition of several days.

In an attempt to illuminate these empirical results, a theoretical model has been proposed that invokes quantum mechanical metaphors to describe the interaction of consciousness with its environment. By representing consciousness by quantum mechanical wave functions and its physical environment by appropriate potential energy profiles, Schrödinger wave mechanics may be used to define eigenfunctions and eigenvalues indicative of psychological and physical experience, both normal and anomalous, in a form applicable to the experimental designs.

The experimental results in hand, along with the generic predictions of the theoretical model, suggest numerous short and longer term practical applications of the phenomena, and raise basic issues about the role of consciousness in the establishment of reality.

Research Notes

Foundational PEAR lab publication that established the REG paradigm, operator-signature concept, and pseudo-random source test central to the PK literature. Virtually every subsequent REG/PK paper in this library either builds on, meta-analyzes, or critiques this dataset. Speaks directly to Controversy #8 (GCP/RNG) and the Bosch et al. 2006 meta-analysis debate.

Presents the first comprehensive report from the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory, covering three PK experiment types and precognitive remote perception. Using a microelectronic REG (33 operators, > 150 million bits), a deterministic pseudo-REG (10 operators, 29 series), and a Random Mechanical Cascade (22 operators, 3,072 runs), the program found small but statistically significant mean shifts in intended directions: REG dPK p < 2 × 10⁻⁴, pseudo-REG dPK p = .003, RMC dPK p = 3 × 10⁻⁶. Remote perception experiments (334 trials, 30 binary descriptors) showed anomalous information acquisition at p ≈ 10⁻¹¹, independent of spatial or temporal separation. Individual operator 'signatures' of achievement transferred across all three PK devices, suggesting effects are not device-specific.

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

📋 Cite this paper
APA
Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Nelson, Roger D (1987). Engineering Anomalies Research. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
BibTeX
@article{jahn_1987_engineering,
  title = {Engineering Anomalies Research},
  author = {Jahn, Robert G and Dunne, Brenda J and Nelson, Roger D},
  year = {1987},
  journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}