Does Psi Exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman's (1999) Meta-Analysis of Ganzfeld Research
📄 Original study ↗📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
In 1999, two researchers declared the ganzfeld telepathy experiment — where someone in sensory deprivation tries to receive mental images from a sender — was a bust. Storm and Ertel disagreed. They assembled 79 studies spanning nearly three decades and found people guessed the right image 31% of the time when chance predicts 25%. That gap sounds modest, but the odds of it being a fluke were less than one in a billion. This telepathy-like effect appeared in every subset of studies, including the very batch skeptics used to declare it dead. Their verdict: the ganzfeld reliably produces anomalous communication, and the negative conclusion came from too small a slice of the evidence.
Actual Paper Abstract
J. Milton and R. Wiseman (1999) attempted to replicate D. Bern and C. Honorton's (1994) meta-analysis. which yielded evidence that the ganzfeld is a suitable method for demonstrating anomalous communication. Using a database of 30 ganzfeld and autoganzfeld studies, Milton and Wiseman's meta-analysis yielded an effect size (£5) of only 0.013 (Stouffer Z = 0.70, p = .24. one-tailed). Thus they failed to replicate Bern and Honorton's finding (ES = 0.162, Stouffer Z = 2.52, p = 5.90 X 10~\ one-tailed). The authors conducted stepwise performance comparisons between all available databases of ganzfeld research, which were argued not to be lacking in quality. Larger aggregates of such studies were formed, including a database comprising 79 ganzfeld-autoganzfeld studies (ES = 0.138. Stouffer Z = 5.66. p = 7.78 x \(y9). Thus Bern and Honorton's positive conclusion was confirmed. More accurate population parameters for the ganzfeld and autoganzfeld domains were calculated. Significant bidirectional psi effects were also found in all databases. The ganzfeld appears to be a replicable technique for producing psi effects in the laboratory.
Research Notes
Pivotal rebuttal in the ganzfeld telepathy debate, published in the same APA journal as Milton and Wiseman's challenge. Established the unified 79-study database and population parameters (ES = 0.14, hit rate 31%) that became standard reference points for the next two decades of ganzfeld meta-analyses. Speaks directly to Controversy #1.
Re-analysis and extension of Milton and Wiseman's (1999) negative ganzfeld meta-analysis, which had found ES = 0.013 (Z = 0.70, p = .24) across 30 studies and questioned whether the ganzfeld paradigm produces replicable ESP. By assembling four databases spanning 1970–1997 — Honorton's (1985) 28 studies, 11 overlooked 1982–1986 studies, Bem and Honorton's (1994) 10 autoganzfeld studies, and Milton and Wiseman's 30 studies — a unified 79-study database yielded ES = 0.138, Stouffer Z = 5.66, p = 7.78 × 10⁻⁹, with an overall hit rate of 31% vs. 25% MCE. Bidirectional psi effects were significant in every database. The authors conclude that the ganzfeld remains a replicable technique for demonstrating anomalous communication.
Links
Related Papers
Cites
Cited By
Extended By
Meta Analyzed By
Also by these authors
More in Telepathy
Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis
Rethinking Communication and Consciousness: Lessons from The Telepathy Tapes Podcast
Taking the Mindfield Literally: Discovering Minds by Assuming Competence Among Nonspeakers
Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone
A Comparison of Four New Automated Telephone Telepathy Tests
📋 Cite this paper
Storm, Lance, Ertel, Suitbert (2001). Does Psi Exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman's (1999) Meta-Analysis of Ganzfeld Research. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.424
@article{storm_2001_does,
title = {Does Psi Exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman's (1999) Meta-Analysis of Ganzfeld Research},
author = {Storm, Lance and Ertel, Suitbert},
year = {2001},
journal = {Psychological Bulletin},
doi = {10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.424},
}