Meta-Analysis of Free-Response Studies 2009-2018: Assessing the Noise-Reduction Model Ten Years On
📄 Original study ↗📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
This sweeping update covers 44 years of research asking whether people can pick up hidden information while in the ganzfeld — a relaxed, sensory-reduced state using halved ping-pong balls over your eyes and white noise in your ears. Combining over a hundred studies, ganzfeld participants identified hidden targets more often than chance, with roughly one-in-a-billion odds against a fluke. Unlike dream-ESP research, there's no sign the effect is fading — it has held steady for four decades. People pre-selected for psychic aptitude did better than unselected volunteers, and both traditional and Bayesian statistics agreed on every finding.
Abstract
We report the results of an update to the meta-analysis by Storm, Tressoldi, and Di Risio (2010). Three types of free-response design were assessed: (i) ganzfeld (a technique that enhances a communication anomaly referred to as 'psi'); (ii) nonganzfeld noise reduction using alleged psi-enhancing techniques (e.g., dreaming, hypnosis, relaxation, and meditation); and (iii) standard free-response (nonganzfeld; no noise reduction). These experimental (laboratory-based) designs allegedly elicit a communications anomaly known as extrasensory perception (ESP; a.k.a. psi). For the period 2009 to 2018, a dataset of nine new ganzfeld studies (Category 1) yielded a mean ES = 0.119; 19 new nonganzfeld noise-reduction studies (Category 2) yielded mean ES = 0.045; and 15 new free-response studies (Category 3) yielded mean ES = 0.050. Stouffer Z scores for all three databases were significant, but each new database was not significantly different from its respective database in Storm et al. (2010). The increased ganzfeld database (N = 38) yielded a mean ES = 0.133; the nonganzfeld noise-reduction dataset (N = 37) yielded mean ES = 0.072; and the standard free-response studies (N = 33) yielded mean ES = 0.027. Again, Stouffer Z scores were significant. We did find category differences, and participants (selected vs. unselected) performed differently, but there were no differences between modality (i.e., type of psi), types of target (e.g., film clips, photographs), or experimenter/laboratory. There was also no evidence of a decline effect across the 44-year period. Finally, we conducted a Bayesian analysis and found that the case for a communications anomaly using free-response designs was upheld.
Related Papers
Extends
Meta Analyzes
Meta Analyzed By
Cites
- Does Psi Exist? Lack of Replication of an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer — Milton, Julie (1999)
- A Bayes Factor Meta-Analysis of Recent Extrasensory Perception Experiments: Comment on Storm, Tressoldi, and Di Risio (2010) — Rouder, Jeffrey N (2013)
- A Joint Communiqué: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy — Hyman, Ray (1986)
Cited By
Also by these authors
On the Correspondence Between Dream Content and Target Material Under Laboratory Conditions: A Meta-Analysis of Dream-ESP Studies, 1966-2016
EEG Correlates of Social Interaction at Distance
Feeling the Future: A Meta-Analysis of 90 Experiments on the Anomalous Anticipation of Random Future Events
More in Telepathy
Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis
Rethinking Communication and Consciousness: Lessons from The Telepathy Tapes Podcast
Taking the Mindfield Literally: Discovering Minds by Assuming Competence Among Nonspeakers
Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone
A Comparison of Four New Automated Telephone Telepathy Tests
📋 Cite this paper
Storm, Lance, Tressoldi, Patrizio E (2020). Meta-Analysis of Free-Response Studies 2009-2018: Assessing the Noise-Reduction Model Ten Years On. Journal of Parapsychology.
@article{storm_2020_metaanalysis,
title = {Meta-Analysis of Free-Response Studies 2009-2018: Assessing the Noise-Reduction Model Ten Years On},
author = {Storm, Lance and Tressoldi, Patrizio E},
year = {2020},
journal = {Journal of Parapsychology},
}