Information in Life, Consciousness, Quantum Physics, and Paranormal Phenomena
π Original study βπ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
After decades studying psychic phenomena, Kennedy steps back and asks a bold question: what if we've been thinking about psi all wrong? He starts with a clear framework β information is just symbols, something to carry them, and a system that gives them meaning. Biology runs on information (DNA, memory, learning, culture), and so does quantum physics. But here's the kicker: despite years of trying, researchers haven't convincingly shown that a person's mind can influence quantum events, and current parapsychology results can't be reliably separated from experimental bias. So Kennedy proposes a dramatic shift. Instead of treating psi as a human ability we should be able to train and harness, maybe psychic phenomena come from independent supernatural agencies with their own agendas β showing up as spiritual experiences that shape a person's life direction. It's unfalsifiable, he admits, but it neatly explains why nobody has ever managed to bottle psi for practical use despite decades of effort.
Abstract
Information consists of symbols, media for storing and transmitting the symbols, and an interpretational infrastructure that establishes the meaning of the symbols, can generate and decode the symbols, and can take actions based on the symbols. Information processing in livings systems includes genetics, perception, behavior, memory, learning, communication, imagination, creativity, and culture. For certain hypotheses in quantum physics and most hypotheses in parapsychology, the media and interpretational infrastructures for information processing are beyond current scientific understanding. After extensive research, the hypothesis that an observer can sometimes paranormally influence the outcome of quantum events does not have convincing empirical support. The current experimental results in parapsychology do not have the properties of a signal in noise and cannot be convincingly distinguished from methodological bias. Prospective registration of experimental protocols could greatly reduce the confounding problem of methodological bias; however, the experimental results will likely continue to be inconsistent with the positions of both proponents and skeptics of experimental parapsychology. The findings of parapsychology may be most consistent with a model that paranormal phenomena are the result of supernatural information processing agencies with relatively independent motivations that manifest as spirituality and influence the meaning and direction of an individual's life.
Related Papers
Extends
Cites
- Does Consciousness Collapse the Wave-Packet? β Bierman, Dick J (2003)
- Examining Psychokinesis: The Interaction of Human Intention With Random Number GeneratorsβA Meta-Analysis β BΓΆsch, Holger (2006)
- The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective β Jahn, Robert G (1982)
Companion
Also by these authors
Experimenter Fraud: What Are Appropriate Methodological Standards?
Is the Methodological Revolution in Psychology Over or Just Beginning?
Bayesian and Classical Hypothesis Testing: Practical Differences for a Controversial Area of Research
More in Overview
Editorial: Emerging Research: Self-Ascribed Parapsychological Abilities
When the Truth Is Out There: Counseling People Who Report Anomalous Experiences
What if consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain? Observational and empirical challenges to materialistic models
Is the Sun Conscious?
Inner Experience β Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology
π Cite this paper
Kennedy, J.E (2011). Information in Life, Consciousness, Quantum Physics, and Paranormal Phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology.
@article{kennedy_2011_information_consciousness,
title = {Information in Life, Consciousness, Quantum Physics, and Paranormal Phenomena},
author = {Kennedy, J.E},
year = {2011},
journal = {Journal of Parapsychology},
}