Skip to main content

Experimenter Effects and the Remote Detection of Staring

📄 Original study
Wiseman, Richard, Schlitz, Marilyn J 1997 Modern Era telepathy

📌 Appears in:

Plain English Summary

Can you feel someone staring at you from another room? A skeptic (Wiseman) and a believer (Schlitz) tested this together — same lab, same equipment, same procedures, same volunteers. They measured skin conductivity (basically how much your palms sweat) while a sender stared at participants through closed-circuit TV or looked away. The results were wild: Schlitz's participants showed a real physical response to being stared at. Wiseman's showed nothing. Same everything, different outcomes depending on who ran it. This is one of the most cited demonstrations of "experimenter effects" — where whoever runs a study somehow influences results. It remains unsolved and raises deep questions about what replication means in science.

Abstract

Each author recently attempted to replicate studies in which participants were asked to psychically detect an unseen gaze. RW's studies failed to find any significant effects whilst MS's study obtained positive findings. The authors then agreed to carry out the joint study described in this paper, in the hope of determining why they had originally obtained such different results. This joint study involved both MS and RW carrying out separate experiments, but running them in the same location, using the same equipment/procedures and drawing participants from the same subject pool. The studies involved placing experimenter and participant in separate rooms linked by a one way closed circuit television system. This allowed the experimenter to see the participant, but not vice versa. The experimental sessions were divided into two sets of randomly ordered trials. During 'stare' trials the experimenter directed his/her attention towards the participant; during 'non-stare' trials the experimenter directed this attention away from the participant. The participants' electrodermal activity (EDA) was continuously recorded throughout each session. Results revealed that the EDA of RW's participants was not significantly different during 'stare' and 'non-stare' trials. In contrast, the EDA of MS's participants was significantly higher in 'stare' than 'non-stare' trials. The paper discusses the likelihood of different interpretations of this effect and urges other psi proponents and skeptics to run similar joint studies.

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Telepathy

📋 Cite this paper
APA
Wiseman, Richard, Schlitz, Marilyn J (1997). Experimenter Effects and the Remote Detection of Staring. Journal of Parapsychology.
BibTeX
@article{wiseman_schlitz_1997_experimenter_staring,
  title = {Experimenter Effects and the Remote Detection of Staring},
  author = {Wiseman, Richard and Schlitz, Marilyn J},
  year = {1997},
  journal = {Journal of Parapsychology},
}