Skip to main content

Decline Effects: Types, Mechanisms, and Personal Reflections

🧐 Skeptical/Critical β†—
Protzko, John, Schooler, Jonathan W β€’ 2017 Current Era β€’ methodology

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

Ever noticed how a splashy scientific finding shrinks when other labs try repeating it? Protzko and Schooler lay out four flavors of this 'decline effect': the original was a fluke, a real finding got inflated by tiny studies, the effect only works under conditions nobody pinned down, or β€” here's the wild part β€” it genuinely fades over time even when everything is held constant. Schooler experienced this firsthand: his verbal overshadowing effect (describing a face in words makes you worse at recognizing it) shrank across a 30-lab replication. Refreshingly, the two authors disagree. Protzko calls most 'genuine' declines statistical mirages; Schooler entertains stranger explanations echoing quantum observer effects. Both prescribe pre-registration and large coordinated replications.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Methodology

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Protzko, John, Schooler, Jonathan W (2017). Decline Effects: Types, Mechanisms, and Personal Reflections. Psychological Science Under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions (Wiley). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119095910.ch6
BibTeX
@article{protzko_2017_decline_effects,
  title = {Decline Effects: Types, Mechanisms, and Personal Reflections},
  author = {Protzko, John and Schooler, Jonathan W},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Psychological Science Under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions (Wiley)},
  doi = {10.1002/9781119095910.ch6},
}