The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain: The Transferred Potential
β‘ Contested βπ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
Could two human brains behave like entangled quantum particles β mysteriously linked across distance? Borrowing from the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in physics (where paired particles instantly mirror each other no matter how far apart), seven pairs meditated together then were placed in shielded, soundproof chambers 14.5 meters apart. One person received light flashes while both had brain activity recorded. In about 25% of deeply connected pairs, the unstimulated person's brain produced patterns eerily matching the other's responses. Controls showed nothing. The paper became hugely influential, inspiring at least five independent replications. Poignantly, lead author Grinberg-Zylberbaum disappeared that same year, making this his final major work.
Abstract
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations between human brains are studied to verify if the brain has a macroscopic quantum component. Pairs of subjects were allowed to interact and were then separated inside semisilent Faraday chambers 14.5 m apart when their EEG activity was registered. Only one subject of each pair was stimulated by lOO flashes. When the stimulated subject showed distinct evoked potentials, the nonstimulated subject showed "transferred potentials" similar to those evoked in the stimulated subject. Control subjects showed no such transferred potentials. The transferred potentials demonstrate brain-to-brain nonlocal EPR correlation between brains, supporting the brain's quantum nature at the macrolevel.
Links
Related Papers
Same Research Program
Precursor
Extended By
- Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects β Wackermann, JiΕΓ (2003)
- Electroencephalographic Evidence of Correlated Event-Related Signals Between the Brains of Spatially and Sensory Isolated Human Subjects β Standish, Leanna J (2004)
- Event-Related Electroencephalographic Correlations Between Isolated Human Subjects β Radin, Dean I (2004)
- Evidence for Correlations Between Distant Intentionality and Brain Function in Recipients: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis β Achterberg, J (2005)
- EEG Correlates of Social Interaction at Distance β Giroldini, William (2016)
- Experimental evidence of non-classical brain functions β Kerskens, Christian Matthias (2022)
- Evidence of Correlated Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signals Between Distant Human Brains β Standish, Leanna J (2003)
Critiqued By
Companion
- Of Two Minds: Sceptic-Proponent Collaboration within Parapsychology β Schlitz, Marilyn J (2006)
- Replicable Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence of Correlated Brain Signals Between Physically and Sensory Isolated Subjects β Richards, Todd L (2005)
- Experimental evidence of non-classical brain functions β Kerskens, Christian Matthias (2022)
- Biological Utilisation of Quantum NonLocality β Josephson, Brian D (1991)
More in Telepathy
Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis
Rethinking Communication and Consciousness: Lessons from The Telepathy Tapes Podcast
Taking the Mindfield Literally: Discovering Minds by Assuming Competence Among Nonspeakers
Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone
A Comparison of Four New Automated Telephone Telepathy Tests
π Cite this paper
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, Jacobo, Delaflor, Montserrat, Attie, Leah, Goswami, Amit (1994). The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain: The Transferred Potential. Physics Essays. https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3029112
@article{grinberg_zylberbaum_1994_transferred_potential,
title = {The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain: The Transferred Potential},
author = {Grinberg-Zylberbaum, Jacobo and Delaflor, Montserrat and Attie, Leah and Goswami, Amit},
year = {1994},
journal = {Physics Essays},
doi = {10.4006/1.3029112},
}