Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects
β‘ Contested βπ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
Can one person's brain react when something happens to someone else in a completely separate, sealed room? This carefully designed study says yes β and the kicker challenges a popular assumption. Researchers recorded brainwaves from pairs of people sitting in electromagnetically shielded rooms (basically Faraday cages blocking all signals). One person was shown flashing visual patterns while the other just relaxed. When they analyzed the relaxing person's brain activity using strict statistical methods, they found unusual spikes that lined up with the stimulation β and this happened significantly more than chance would predict. Here's the really surprising part: it didn't matter whether the pairs were emotionally close or total strangers. Both groups showed the same effect, which throws a wrench into the idea that you need some special emotional bond for this kind of brain-to-brain connection. Published in a mainstream neuroscience journal, this is one of the more methodologically tight studies in the field.
Actual Paper Abstract
Six channels electroencephalogram (EEG) were recorded simultaneously from pairs of separated human subjects in two acoustically and electromagnetically shielded rooms. While brain electric responses to visual pattern-reversal stimuli were elicited in one subject, the other subject relaxed without stimulation. EEGs of both subjects were averaged at times of stimulus onset, effective voltage of the averaged signals was computed within a running window, and expressed as ratio (Q) to the effective voltage of averaged EEG signal from non-stimulation periods. These ratios in non-stimulated subjects at the latency of the maximum response in stimulated subjects were analysed. Signiο¬cant departures of Q ratios from reference distributions, based on baseline EEG in non-stimulation periods, were found in most non-stimulated subjects. The results indicate that correlations between brain activities of two separated subjects may occur, although no biophysical mechanism is known.
Research Notes
Methodologically rigorous extension of Grinberg-Zylberbaum's 'transferred potential' paradigm, using shielded rooms, pattern-reversal stimuli, and non-parametric randomization statistics. Published in a mainstream neuroscience journal. Key finding that unrelated pairs showed the same effect challenges empathic-bond hypotheses central to this debate.
Six-channel EEGs were recorded from pairs of spatially separated subjects in electromagnetically and acoustically shielded rooms. One subject received 72 visual pattern-reversal stimuli while the other relaxed. Thirty-eight participants formed four groups: related pairs with empathic tuning-in (E1, 7 pairs), unrelated pairs (E2, 7 pairs), sham-stimulation controls (K1, 3 pairs), and single-subject controls (K2, 4 individuals). Non-parametric randomization statistics showed outlier counts in non-stimulated subjects' EEGs deviated strongly from Poisson fits in both experimental groups versus controls (G=14.13, 4 d.f., P < 0.01). The effect appeared equally in related and unrelated pairs, challenging the assumption that emotional connectedness is essential.
Links
Related Papers
Precursor
Critiqued By
Replicated By
Extended By
- Evidence for Correlations Between Distant Intentionality and Brain Function in Recipients: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis β Achterberg, J (2005)
- Searching for Neuronal Markers of Psi: A Summary of Three Studies Measuring Electrophysiology in Distant Participants β Hinterberger, T (2010)
- Gut Feelings, Intuition, and Emotions: An Exploratory Study β Radin, Dean I (2005)
Companion
- Evidence of Correlated Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signals Between Distant Human Brains β Standish, Leanna J (2003)
- Electroencephalographic Evidence of Correlated Event-Related Signals Between the Brains of Spatially and Sensory Isolated Human Subjects β Standish, Leanna J (2004)
- Replicable Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence of Correlated Brain Signals Between Physically and Sensory Isolated Subjects β Richards, Todd L (2005)
- Experimental evidence of non-classical brain functions β Kerskens, Christian Matthias (2022)
- Event-Related Electroencephalographic Correlations Between Isolated Human Subjects β Radin, Dean I (2004)
Cited By
- Mental Connection at Distance: Useful for Solving Difficult Tasks? β Tressoldi, Patrizio E (2011)
- EEG Correlates of Social Interaction at Distance β Giroldini, William (2016)
- Near-Death Experience, Consciousness, and the Brain: A New Concept About the Continuity of Our Consciousness Based on Recent Scientific Research on Near-Death Experience in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest β van Lommel, Pim (2006)
Also by these authors
Evidence for Anomalistic Correlations Between Human Behavior and a Random Event Generator: Result of an Independent Replication of a Micro-PK Experiment
Inner Experience β Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology
Parapsychological Phenomena as Examples of Generalized Nonlocal CorrelationsβA Theoretical Framework
More in Telepathy
Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis
Rethinking Communication and Consciousness: Lessons from The Telepathy Tapes Podcast
Taking the Mindfield Literally: Discovering Minds by Assuming Competence Among Nonspeakers
Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone
A Comparison of Four New Automated Telephone Telepathy Tests
π Cite this paper
Wackermann, JiΕΓ, Seiter, Christian, Keibel, Holger, Walach, Harald (2003). Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects. Neuroscience Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01248-X
@article{wackermann_2003_correlations,
title = {Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects},
author = {Wackermann, JiΕΓ and Seiter, Christian and Keibel, Holger and Walach, Harald},
year = {2003},
journal = {Neuroscience Letters},
doi = {10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01248-X},
}