Skip to main content

Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration

⚑ Contested β†—
Bancel, Peter A β€’ 2017 Current Era β€’ psychokinesis

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This is the published journal version of Bancel's insider critique of the Global Consciousness Project, and it packs the same punch. The GCP placed dozens of random number generators (electronic coin-flippers) around the world to see if major global events nudge the numbers off-kilter. After 17 years and 26 billion-plus trials, the answer looks like a resounding yes β€” the data deviate from chance by 7 standard deviations, a result so extreme the odds against coincidence are astronomical. But Bancel, himself a GCP collaborator, says hold on. He points out that technical details of how the generators work β€” specifically XOR processing and loose timing synchronization β€” make a simple 'global consciousness field' explanation implausible. His four tests of 'self-referential fine-tuning' are the real kicker: the effect appears only for officially designated events, at exactly the specified time blocks, and vanishes for unregistered comparison days. Translation? The anomaly seems tethered to the intentions of the experimenters running the show, not to billions of humans feeling something simultaneously. Bancel reframes the whole project as evidence for individual goal-oriented psychokinesis β€” a bold, self-critical move from inside parapsychology that challenges one of the field's most celebrated claims.

Abstract

The Global Consciousness Project (GCP) maintains a long-term experiment that investigates the possibility of a subtle connection between the collective mental activity of humans and the physical behavior of systems in the surrounding environment. The Project formulates this proposition as a broad hypothesis that relates the output of true random number generators (RNGs) to times of intense, collective mental attention during major world events. Over 17 years, the hypothesis has been tested on nearly 500 events, yielding a cumulative result that rejects the null hypothesis by seven standard deviations, apparently lending strong support to the proposal of global consciousness. However, an alternate interpretation is that the result is due to an anomalous effect associated with persons directly engaged with the experiment. This article examines these interpretations and finds that the data do not support the global consciousness proposal. Rather, analyses indicate that the GCP result is due to a goal-oriented effect associated with individuals, similar to effects reported in prior research that studies subject engagement with RNG outputs. An operational definition of goal-oriented effects is presented, which allows for explicit tests of the data. All of the tests favor the interpretation of a goal-oriented effect. (Explore 2017; 13:94-101 & 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Bancel, Peter A (2017). Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2016.12.003
BibTeX
@article{bancel_2017_searching,
  title = {Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration},
  author = {Bancel, Peter A},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing},
  doi = {10.1016/j.explore.2016.12.003},
}