Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration
⚡ Contested ↗📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
For nearly two decades, the Global Consciousness Project scattered 50-60 random number generators (basically electronic coin-flippers) across the planet, hoping to catch the world's mind in the act. After 491 pre-registered events and over 26 billion trials, the numbers did something they shouldn't have: they drifted away from pure chance by a staggering 7 standard deviations — odds against fluke of better than one in a trillion. Pretty wild! But here's the twist: one of the project's own collaborators, Peter Bancel, argues the results don't actually show a 'global consciousness field' washing over the network. Technical problems — like the way the generators process data internally and sloppy timing synchronization — rule out that tidy story. Instead, Bancel ran four clever tests and found the effect only shows up for events that were officially registered, at exactly the time windows the experimenters specified. Unregistered 'Earth Day' equivalents? Dead flat, nothing. His provocative conclusion: the anomaly tracks the intentions of the small group running the experiment, not humanity's collective mood. It's evidence for goal-oriented psychokinesis — minds influencing machines — tied to the engaged researchers themselves. A fascinating case of a field challenging its own favorite narrative.
Abstract
The Global Consciousness Project (GCP) maintains a long-term experiment that investigates the possibility of a subtle connection between the collective mental activity of humans and the physical behavior of systems in the surrounding environment. The Project formulates this proposition as a broad hypothesis that relates the output of true random number generators (RNGs) to times of intense, collective mental attention during major world events. Over 17 years, the hypothesis has been tested on nearly 500 events, yielding a cumulative result that rejects the null hypothesis by 7 standard deviations, apparently lending strong support to the proposal of global consciousness. However, an alternate interpretation is that the result is due to an anomalous effect associated with persons directly engaged with the experiment. This paper examines these interpretations and finds that the data do not support the global consciousness proposal. Rather, analyses indicate that the GCP result is due to a goal-oriented effect associated with individuals, similar to effects reported in prior research that studies subject engagement with RNG outputs. An operational definition of goal-oriented effects is presented which allows for explicit tests of the data. All of the tests favor the interpretation of a goal-oriented effect.
Links
Related Papers
Cites
Extends
Companion
- Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration — Bancel, Peter A (2017)
- Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter — Dodds, Peter Sheridan (2011)
- Coherent Consciousness and Reduced Randomness: Correlations on September 11, 2001 — Nelson, Roger D (2002)
Critiques
Also by these authors
More in Psychokinesis
Observer Influence on Quantum Interference: Testing the von Neumann-Wigner Consciousness-Collapse Theory
Anomalous Entropic Effects in Physical Systems Associated with Collective Consciousness
Psychophysical Interactions with Electrical Plasma: Three Exploratory Experiments
Psychophysical Effects on an Interference Pattern in a Double-Slit Optical System: An Exploratory Analysis of Variance
Psychophysical Interactions with a Double-Slit Interference Pattern: Exploratory Evidence of a Causal Influence
📋 Cite this paper
Bancel, Peter A (2017). Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2016.12.003
@article{bancel_2017_global_consciousness,
title = {Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration},
author = {Bancel, Peter A},
year = {2017},
journal = {Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing},
doi = {10.1016/j.explore.2016.12.003},
}