Skip to main content

Toward Understanding the Placebo Effect: Investigating a Possible Retrocausal Factor

๐Ÿ“„ Original study โ†—
Radin, Dean, Lobach, Eva โ€ข 2007 Modern Era โ€ข precognition

๐Ÿ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

What if your brain somehow knows what's about to happen before it actually does? This study tested that wild idea by hooking up 20 volunteers to EEG sensors measuring brain waves at the back of the head (the visual processing area). Each person sat through 100 trials where a true random number generator โ€” basically an electronic coin flip that nobody could predict โ€” decided whether they'd see a bright flash or nothing. The researchers then looked at the brain's slow electrical shifts in the moments before the flash was randomly chosen. Here's where it gets really interesting: women's brains showed a statistically significant difference in activity roughly 1.4 to 0.8 seconds before the stimulus, as if anticipating what was coming. Men showed a weaker, opposite-direction trend. The gender gap itself was highly significant. And just to make sure the equipment wasn't producing a fluke, the researchers ran the same setup on a grapefruit wired up as a "sham brain" โ€” which, reassuringly, showed absolutely nothing. The authors connect this "presentiment" effect to the placebo effect, suggesting that if the body can somehow respond to future events, that retrocausal influence might partly explain why people improve just from expecting a treatment to work.

Abstract

Objective: Conventional models of placebo effects assume that all mindโ€“body responses associated with expectation can be explained by ordinary causal processes. This experiment tested whether some placebo effects may also involve retrocausal, or time-reversed, influences. Design: Slow cortical potentials in the brain were monitored while adult volunteers anticipated either a flash of light or no flash, selected with equal probability by a noise-based random number generator. Data were collected in individual sessions of 100 trials, contributed by 13 female and 7 male adult participants. Outcome measures: Ensemble median slow cortical potentials 1 second prior to a light flash were compared with the same measures prior to no flash. A nonparametric randomized permutation technique was used to statistically assess the observed difference. Electroencephalographic data were analyzed separately by gender. Results: Females' slow cortical potentials significantly differentiated before stimulus onset (z  2.72, p  0.007, two-tailed); males showed a suggestive effect in the opposite direction (z  1.64, p  0.10, two-tailed). Examination of alternative explanations indicated that the significant effect in females was not caused by anticipatory strategies, equipment or environmental artifacts, or violation of statistical assumptions. Conclusions: This experiment, in accordance with previous studies showing similar, unconscious "presentiment" effects in humans, suggests that comprehensive models seeking to explain placebo effects, and in general how expectation affects the mind and body, may require consideration of retrocausal influences.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Precognition

๐Ÿ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Radin, Dean, Lobach, Eva (2007). Toward Understanding the Placebo Effect: Investigating a Possible Retrocausal Factor. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.6243
BibTeX
@article{radin_2007_toward,
  title = {Toward Understanding the Placebo Effect: Investigating a Possible Retrocausal Factor},
  author = {Radin, Dean and Lobach, Eva},
  year = {2007},
  journal = {The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine},
  doi = {10.1089/acm.2006.6243},
}