Skip to main content

Bem's 'Feeling the Future' (2011) Five Years Later: Its Impact on Scientific Literature

๐Ÿ“„ Original study
Silva, Bruno A, Poeschl, Gabrielle โ€ข 2017 Current Era โ€ข precognition

๐Ÿ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

When Daryl Bem published his 2011 paper claiming people could sense the future, the scientific world fractured. Silva and Poeschl mapped how by analyzing 162 published responses over five years. Mainstream psychology journals used Bem's paper as a cautionary tale, fueling debates about replication and Bayesian statistics (a different way of weighing evidence). Meanwhile, parapsychology and physics journals engaged with precognition itself, connecting it to quantum theory. The statistics debate spiked in 2011; replication concerns peaked in 2015 -- tracking psychology's broader 'replication crisis.' One paper, two completely different conversations depending on your academic tribe.

Actual Paper Abstract

The study analyses the impact on scientific literature of the controversial 2011 article by Bem, "Feeling the Future." Texts that cite Bemยดs article (N = 162) were identified from the Elsevier Scopus database for the years 2011 to 2015. Their summaries were analyzed using the Iramuteq program for textual data. The analysis suggested that the impact can be grouped into four classes: (a) The Replication class is characterized by a vocabulary addressing the role of replication in psychology research; (b) the Bayesian class reflects the perceived merits of this approach when compared with more traditional inferential statistics, namely statistics relying on p values; (c) the Experimental Studies of Anomalous Experiences (AE) class includes terms related to classical empirical research, applied in AE studies, and concepts, methodologies and theories specific to parapsychological research; (d) the Quantum Phenomena and Theories class vocabulary suggests that quantum theories of brain/consciousness function may leave the

Research Notes

Only systematic bibliometric map of the Bem controversy's disciplinary reception, documenting the fracture between psychology's methodological critique and parapsychology/physics engagement with psi content. Note: lead author is Silva, not Bem โ€” catalog ID is a legacy naming artifact.

Bibliometric text analysis of N=162 Scopus-indexed texts citing Bem's (2011) 'Feeling the Future' precognition article, covering 2011-2015. Using Iramuteq's downward hierarchical classification (Alceste method), 622 of 721 text segments (86.3%) were sorted into four impact classes: Replication in Psychology Research (31.4%), Bayesian Statistical Inference (26.9%), Experimental Anomalous Experiences (24.6%), and Quantum Phenomena and Theories (17.2%). Psychology-indexed sources dominate the critical Replication and Bayesian classes (ฯ‡ยฒ=36.96, 20.74), while non-psychology sources dominate the Anomalous Experiences and Quantum classes (ฯ‡ยฒ=18.87, 61.84). The Bayesian class peaks in 2011 and the Replication class in 2015, tracking the evolving methodological reform debate.

Related Papers

More in Precognition

๐Ÿ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Silva, Bruno A, Poeschl, Gabrielle (2017). Bem's 'Feeling the Future' (2011) Five Years Later: Its Impact on Scientific Literature. Journal of Parapsychology.
BibTeX
@article{bem_2017_five_years_later,
  title = {Bem's 'Feeling the Future' (2011) Five Years Later: Its Impact on Scientific Literature},
  author = {Silva, Bruno A and Poeschl, Gabrielle},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Journal of Parapsychology},
}