Skip to main content

Consistency of Near-Death Experience Accounts over Two Decades: Are Reports Embellished over Time?

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Greyson, Bruce β€’ 2007 Modern Era β€’ nde

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

Critics have long suspected that people who report near-death experiences (NDEs) gradually embellish their stories over time, making the whole field unreliable. Bruce Greyson put that idea to the test in a remarkably thorough way: he had 72 people fill out a standardized NDE questionnaire in the early 1980s, then tracked them down roughly 20 years later and had them fill it out again -- without peeking at their old answers. The result? Their scores were essentially identical, with a rock-solid correlation of 0.83. Even more striking, the feel-good parts of the experience actually dipped slightly rather than getting rosier. Published in the respected medical journal Resuscitation, this study is a big deal because it tells every other NDE researcher: yes, people's memories of these experiences hold up over decades.

Actual Paper Abstract

Aim: ''Near-death experiences,'' commonly reported after clinical death and resuscitation, may require intervention and, if reliable, may elucidate altered brain functioning under extreme stress. It has been speculated that accounts of near-death experiences are exaggerated over the years. The objective of this study was to test the reliability over two decades of accounts of near-death experiences. Methods: Seventy-two patients with near-death experience who had completed the NDE scale in the 1980s (63% of the original cohort still alive) completed the scale a second time, without reference to the original scale administration. The primary outcome was differences in NDE scale scores on the two administrations. The secondary outcome was the statistical association between differences in scores and years elapsed between the two administrations. Results: Mean scores did not change significantly on the total NDE scale, its 4 factors, or its 16 items. Correlation coefficients between scores on the two administrations were significant at P < 0.001 for the total NDE scale, for its 4 factors, and for its 16 items. Correlation coefficients between score changes and time elapsed between the two administrations were not significant for the total NDE scale, for its 4 factors, or for its 16 items. Conclusion: Contrary to expectation, accounts of near-death experiences, and particularly reports of their positive affect, were not embellished over a period of almost two decades. These data support the reliability of near-death experience accounts.

Research Notes

First long-term (20-year) quantitative study of NDE memory reliability using the NDE Scale. From UVA Division of Perceptual Studies (DOPS). Published in a mainstream medical journal (Resuscitation), lending clinical credibility. Directly refutes the 'embellishment over time' criticism of retrospective NDE research. Key validation study for the entire NDE research field.

Longitudinal test-retest study of NDE memory reliability. 72 NDE experiencers (63% of 115 surviving original cohort) completed the NDE Scale in the early 1980s and again 2002-2005, mean interval 19.1 years (SD=2.4), without reference to original responses. Total NDE Scale scores unchanged: T1=14.60Β±6.97, T2=14.24Β±7.94, t(71)=0.69, p=0.49. Test-retest r=0.83 (p < 0.001) for total; all 4 factors and 16 items at p < 0.001. Score changes not correlated with time elapsed (r=-0.14, p=0.24). Contrary to embellishment hypothesis, positive affect reports showed nonsignificant decline. Published in Resuscitation.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Nde

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Greyson, Bruce (2007). Consistency of Near-Death Experience Accounts over Two Decades: Are Reports Embellished over Time?. Resuscitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.013
BibTeX
@article{greyson_2007_consistency_nde,
  title = {Consistency of Near-Death Experience Accounts over Two Decades: Are Reports Embellished over Time?},
  author = {Greyson, Bruce},
  year = {2007},
  journal = {Resuscitation},
  doi = {10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.013},
}