Skip to main content

Testing for Telepathy in Connection with E-mails

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Sheldrake, Rupert, Smart, Pamela β€’ 2005 Modern Era β€’ telepathy

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

If telephone telepathy is a thing, does it work over email too? That's what this study asked, and the results are striking. Participants guessed which of four people was about to email them, submitting their guess one minute before the message arrived β€” all time-stamped to prove guesses came first. In round one, 50 participants took 552 guesses and got it right 43% of the time, crushing the 25% chance rate with astronomically significant statistics (p = 2 x 10^-19). An impressive 43 out of 50 people scored above chance. Round two upped the anti-fraud game: five top performers did 30 more trials while continuously filmed, with screens covered between trials. Their hit rate actually *rose* to 47% β€” a powerful argument against cheating, since scores should drop under surveillance if someone's gaming the system, not improve. One wild finding: people were significantly better at identifying emails from people they knew versus strangers. Some participants scored well with senders thousands of miles away, including one whose emailers were in Hong Kong. That familiarity effect matters because it favors telepathy (mind-to-mind connection) over alternatives like clairvoyance (directly perceiving hidden information) or precognition (predicting random events). This study directly inspired a later automated version, making it a stepping stone toward more standardized psi research.

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Telepathy

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Sheldrake, Rupert, Smart, Pamela (2005). Testing for Telepathy in Connection with E-mails. Perceptual and Motor Skills.
BibTeX
@article{sheldrake_2005_email_telepathy,
  title = {Testing for Telepathy in Connection with E-mails},
  author = {Sheldrake, Rupert and Smart, Pamela},
  year = {2005},
  journal = {Perceptual and Motor Skills},
}