Skip to main content

Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results

📄 Original study
Nosek, Brian A, Lakens, Daniël 2014 Modern Era methodology

Plain English Summary

What if scientific journals judged a study's worth before anyone peeked at the results? That's the big idea behind Registered Reports, introduced here in a landmark special issue of Social Psychology -- the first journal issue anywhere made up entirely of pre-registered replication studies. Researchers submitted their plans upfront, got peer-reviewed on methodology alone, locked in their designs publicly, and then collected data with publication guaranteed no matter what happened. This flips the usual incentive structure, where surprising or positive findings get published and boring-but-honest null results gather dust. The reform was partly sparked by controversies like Bem's famous precognition paper, which highlighted how flexible methods and publication bias can warp science. It's now a cornerstone of the credibility revolution reshaping psychology and beyond.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Methodology

📋 Cite this paper
APA
Nosek, Brian A, Lakens, Daniël (2014). Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results. Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
BibTeX
@article{nosek_2014_registered,
  title = {Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results},
  author = {Nosek, Brian A and Lakens, Daniël},
  year = {2014},
  journal = {Social Psychology},
  doi = {10.1027/1864-9335/a000192},
}