Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis
β‘ Contested βπ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
Can you nudge matter with your mind? Researchers at a major German university tested this with over 12,500 people across three countries, asking relaxed participants to mentally influence a quantum random number generator (a device producing unpredictable numbers via quantum physics). The verdict? A resounding no. Using rigorous Bayesian testing where they collected data until evidence was decisive, they found clear 10-to-1 odds favoring zero effect. No personality type helped. One curious wrinkle: results showed a wobbly wave-like pattern over time that differed from runs with no human watching, but that finding was exploratory rather than pre-planned.
Abstract
Intentional effects of human observation on the output of quantum-based random number generators (tRNG) have been studied for decades now. This research has been known as micro-psychokinesis (micro-PK) and many studies in the ο¬eld reported evidence for mentally induced non-random deviations from chance. A most recent meta-analysis from BΓΆsch et al. (2006) revealed a very small and heterogeneous overall effect size that indicated a signiο¬cant deviation from chance across studies. There remains doubt among the scientiο¬c community on the existence of micro-PK given: (i) the small and heterogenous effect; and (ii) the fact that several independent replication attempts of prominent studies failed to conο¬rm the original results. The study presented here was intended to provide decisive evidence for or against the existence of micro-PK. An online experiment with 12,571 participants was conducted. The Bayesian analysis revealed strong evidence for H0 (BF01 = 10.07). Thus, micro-PK did not exist in the data. A closer inspection of the temporal change of the effect seemed to suggest a non-random oscillative structure with a higher frequency than observed in simulated data. The possible role of entropy and the relation to the model of pragmatic information from von Lucadou (2015) is discussed.
Links
Related Papers
Critiques
Companion
- A Preregistered Multi-Lab Replication of Maier et al. (2014, Exp. 4) Testing Retroactive Avoidance β Maier, Markus A (2020)
- Evidence for Anomalistic Correlations Between Human Behavior and a Random Event Generator: Result of an Independent Replication of a Micro-PK Experiment β Walach, Harald (2020)
- Nonlocality, Intention, and Observer Effects in Healing Studies: Laying a Foundation for the Future β Schwartz, Stephan A (2010)
- Observer Influence on Quantum Interference: Testing the von Neumann-Wigner Consciousness-Collapse Theory β Radin, Dean (2025)
- Does Consciousness Collapse the Wave-Packet? β Bierman, Dick J (2003)
- False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol β Walleczek, Jan (2019)
Also by these authors
More in Psychokinesis
New Year's Eve as a Case Study in Experimental Metaphysics: Exploring Global Consciousness in Random Physical Systems
Anomalous Entropic Effects in Physical Systems Associated with Collective Consciousness
Psychophysical Interactions with Electrical Plasma: Three Exploratory Experiments
Psychophysical Effects on an Interference Pattern in a Double-Slit Optical System: An Exploratory Analysis of Variance
Psychophysical Interactions with a Double-Slit Interference Pattern: Exploratory Evidence of a Causal Influence
π Cite this paper
Maier, Markus A, Dechamps, Moritz C, Pflitsch, Markus (2018). Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00379
@article{maier_2018_intentional_observer,
title = {Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis},
author = {Maier, Markus A and Dechamps, Moritz C and Pflitsch, Markus},
year = {2018},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00379},
}