Skip to main content

Survival or Super-psi?

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Braude, Stephen E β€’ 1992 STAR GATE Era β€’ mediumship

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

What if the best evidence for life after death could be explained by the living having incredibly powerful psychic abilities? That's philosopher Stephen Braude's provocative argument here. He challenged researchers who claimed phenomena like people suddenly speaking foreign languages they'd never learned ("xenoglossy") proved past lives. His core point: we simply don't know how far psychic abilities might stretch, so maybe living people are unconsciously pulling off these feats themselves. He examined fascinating cases -- child prodigies, a mysterious literary persona called Patience Worth, and dissociative conditions -- arguing human abilities are far stranger than assumed. Important enough to spark a published debate with Ian Stevenson in the same journal issue.

Abstract

Even the most sophisticated discussions of the evidence for survival underestimate the conceptual difficulties facing the survival hypothesis. Perhaps the major challenge is posed by the rival "super-psi" hypothesis, which most writers fail to confront in its most plausible and potent form. Once the super-psi hypothesis is taken seriously, two major weaknesses in discussions of survival stand out clearly. First, analyses of apparently anomalous knowledge that tend to be fatally superficial in their treatment of subject psychodynamics. And second, analyses of apparently anomalous abilities and skills trade on an impoverished and naive conception of the nature of human abilities.

Related Papers

More in Mediumship

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Braude, Stephen E (1992). Survival or Super-psi?. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
BibTeX
@article{braude_1992_survival,
  title = {Survival or Super-psi?},
  author = {Braude, Stephen E},
  year = {1992},
  journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}