Skip to main content

Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in Cardiac Bypass Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Uncertainty and Certainty of Receiving Intercessory Prayer

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Benson, Herbert, Dusek, Jeffery A, Sherwood, Jane B, Lam, Peter, Bethea, Charles F, Carpenter, William, Levitsky, Sidney, Hill, Peter C, Clem, Donald W. Jr, Jain, Manoj K, Drumel, David, Kopecky, Stephen L, Mueller, Paul S, Marek, Dean, Rollins, Sue, Hibberd, Patricia L β€’ 2006 Modern Era β€’ healing

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This was the big one β€” the largest rigorous test of whether prayer from strangers helps sick people. Researchers enrolled 1,802 heart bypass patients across six hospitals in three groups: some prayed for but unaware, some not prayed for and unaware, and some told they were definitely receiving prayer. Three Christian groups prayed for each patient for 14 days. Prayer made no difference for unaware patients β€” about 52% had complications either way. But here's the twist: patients who knew they were being prayed for did worse, with 59% experiencing complications β€” a statistically significant negative effect! Some researchers suspect a "nocebo" response β€” perhaps knowing people are praying for you creates anxiety or signals your situation is serious.

Abstract

Background Intercessory prayer is widely believed to influence recovery from illness, but claims of benefits are not supported by well-controlled clinical trials. Prior studies have not addressed whether prayer itself or knowledge/certainty that prayer is being provided may influence outcome. We evaluated whether (1) receiving intercessory prayer or (2) being certain of receiving intercessory prayer was associated with uncomplicated recovery after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG} surgery. Methods Patients at 6 US hospitals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: 604 received intercessory prayer after being informed that they may or may not receive prayer; 597 did not receive intercessory prayer also after being informed that they may or may not receive prayer; and 601 received intercessory prayer after being informed they would receive prayer. Intercessory prayer was provided for 14 days, starting the night before CABG. The primary outcome was presence of any complication within 30 days of CABG. Secondary outcomes were any major event and mortality. Results tn the 2 groups uncertain about receiving intercessory prayer, complications occurred in 52% (315/604) of patients who received intercessory prayer versus 51% (304/597) of those who did not (relative risk 1.02, 95% Cl 0.92-1.15). Complications occurred in 59% (352/601) of patients certain of receiving intercessory prayer compared with the 52% (315/604) of those uncertain of receiving intercessory prayer (relative risk 1.14, 95% Cl 1.02-1.28). Major events and 30-day mortality were similar across the 3 groups. Conclusions Intercessory prayer itself had no effect on complicationfree recovery from CABG, but certainty of receiving intercessory prayer was associated with a higher incidence of complications. (Am Heart J 2006;151:934-42)

Links

Related Papers

More in Healing

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Benson, Herbert, Dusek, Jeffery A, Sherwood, Jane B, Lam, Peter, Bethea, Charles F, Carpenter, William, Levitsky, Sidney, Hill, Peter C, Clem, Donald W. Jr, Jain, Manoj K, Drumel, David, Kopecky, Stephen L, Mueller, Paul S, Marek, Dean, Rollins, Sue, Hibberd, Patricia L (2006). Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in Cardiac Bypass Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Uncertainty and Certainty of Receiving Intercessory Prayer. American Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028
BibTeX
@article{benson_2006_therapeutic,
  title = {Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in Cardiac Bypass Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Uncertainty and Certainty of Receiving Intercessory Prayer},
  author = {Benson, Herbert and Dusek, Jeffery A and Sherwood, Jane B and Lam, Peter and Bethea, Charles F and Carpenter, William and Levitsky, Sidney and Hill, Peter C and Clem, Donald W. Jr and Jain, Manoj K and Drumel, David and Kopecky, Stephen L and Mueller, Paul S and Marek, Dean and Rollins, Sue and Hibberd, Patricia L},
  year = {2006},
  journal = {American Heart Journal},
  doi = {10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028},
}